Evangelicals on Bandwagons

Feb 3rd, 2012 | By | Category: News Flashes

Why evangelicals support serial adulterers, Mormons and morons for public office

By William J. Murray

William J. Murray

The Florida GOP primary was an embarrassment to me as an evangelical Christian. The election results were an embarrassment because they exposed the core of what motivates evangelicals – the bandwagon. Apparently, the louder and brighter the bandwagon is the more likely evangelicals will jump on board as it goes through town.

Even the mainstream media commentators agree that Rick Santorum is the most conservative, and the only consistent social conservative, of the four remaining GOP presidential candidates. That didn’t stop the majority of evangelicals from jumping on the Newt Gingrich bandwagon as it burst out of a South Carolina victory. But within a week, evangelicals were jumping off the Newt bandwagon and rushing toward the Mitt Romney bandwagon that was bigger, more colorful and had lots of money to light up the town.

These are the same evangelicals who had left Michele Bachmann at the altar and tossed Gov. Rick Perry under the bus because those two evangelicals didn’t look like winners. This philosophy may go hand in hand with the number of evangelical pastors who are chasing the culture for church members rather than challenging the culture with the gospel.

The statistics in Florida were staggering. About 38 percent of evangelical Christians voted for an ultra-rich Mormon who made his money managing a hedge fund and has a dubious record as a conservative. Thirty-seven percent voted for a serial adulterer who owns a K Street firm that peddles influence in Washington, D.C. A staggering 5 percent voted for a libertarian who believes Israel should be abandoned and that the federal government should have no laws against recreational drugs such as heroin.

In all, 75 percent of the evangelical vote went to Romney and Gingrich, two men who have much in common. Both men supported the radical environmentalists’ “cap-and-trade” that would destroy American jobs. Both men supported mandated medical insurance. In Gingrich’s case he promoted Obamacare-type mandated insurance for nearly 20 years. Both men, at one time or another, supported some type of amnesty for illegal immigrants, which makes the rule of law a travesty. Both men supported the Wall Street bailouts. Sen. Santorum, who never held any of these liberal positions, received 15 percent of the evangelical vote.

Unlike Gingrich, Santorum has never been accused of adultery and has been married to just one woman for 22 years. My evangelical friends who support Newt Gingrich defend their support of him by telling me he has repented of his various affairs and sought forgiveness from his family and from God, and that his rather abysmal sexual behavior is forgiven. They fail to remember that the behavior occurred at a time he was a weekly, church-attending evangelical before converting to Catholicism. Those forgiving Newt Gingrich still giggle over the White House behavior of Bill Clinton.

Evangelicals in the GOP just want a winner, and it matters little to them what his religious beliefs are or what his personal behavior is. Evangelicals seem to have joined the rest of the mainstream Protestant church in America, which appears far more concerned with political and cultural issues than spiritual issues. If pastors would preach the gospel truth and warn about how sin leads to hell, as was done when America was still a great nation rather than a bankrupt nation, the church would once again become genuinely influential. If a gospel message rather than a social message were preached each Sunday, parishioners would seek honorable men of integrity to lead them, not circus clowns tossing candy from brightly lit bandwagons during an everlasting political Mardi Gras.


William J. Murray is the chairman of the Washington, D.C.-based Religious Freedom Coalitionand the author of seven books including “My Life Without God,” which chronicles his early life in the home of destructive atheist and Marxist leader Madalyn Murray O’Hair, the woman who filed the lawsuit removing prayer and Bible reading from America’s public schools. Having lived the Ayn Rand lifestyle, he has a unique prospective of the political candidates.


Tags: , , , , , , ,

3 Comments to “Evangelicals on Bandwagons”

  1. M.K. Says says:

    Well said, I agree 100%.

  2. Jamin Jayman says:

    I agree 100% as well… I’m forwarding my GING-PAC newsletter to my list with the recomendation to at least read this article. Rick Santorum is indeed the best left of all the candidates and we must rally behind him with everything we have right now, including our fervent prayers and any money we can truly part with without having major financial pain later on. Thank you Bill for leadership and all you do for religious freedom and our country.

  3. Mary A. Cole says:

    Well said! Myself, I have felt like a yo-yo during this extended campaign. I forgot some important things about Gingrich. Fortunately, they were eventually brought to light. His history would provide the Democrats with a lot of fodder to bury him with should he be nominated. Romney is too much like Obama. A lot of Protestants and Catholics would not vote if the choice were between Obama or Romney. But how are you going to get the RHINO establishment to nominate Santorum? Liberals of either party would not vote for him, but the conservative base would. Some rough edges that hinder Santorum: 1) He gets angry and scolds. (Do we want to listen to that for 4 years?) 2) He dresses carelessly sometimes. (E.g., brown shoes with a suit that goes with black shoes. Would he dress like that to met a world leader?) 3) He needs more photo ops showing him as a warm, loving person like the one with him and his youngest daughter. Has Santorum considered how he would handle the Sarah Palin treatment he would get if he were the nominee? The liberals had no qualms about attacking even baby Tryg. The Irish have a bet on that Romney will get the nomination and will lose to Obama–for the same reason that McCain lost to him. Not enough difference between them and Obama knows how to manipulate a crowd. These are some things to think about.

Leave a Comment

*