Democrat Platform: God & Jerusalem Out – Abortion & Gay Marriage In

Sep 5th, 2012 | By | Category: News Flashes

Conservative Books and DVD’s

There’s no clearer distinction between the anti-God secularists in the Democrat Party and the traditionalists in the Republican Party than what’s in their new party platforms.

The Democrats have just hashed out their Big Government platform. They’ve deliberately left out any mention of God in the platform or the importance of Jerusalem, but they want Americans to pay for abortions and want gay marriages legalized in every state in the union.

In the 2008 Democrat platform, it talked about working people and their “God-given potential.” In the 2012 platform, “God-given” has been deliberately deleted. This comes as no surprise. To those currently controlling the Democrat Party, their “god” is the all-powerful central government. It creates “rights” like abortion on demand, illegal immigration, and homosexual marriages. And, it takes our constitutionally guaranteed rights of religious freedom away through executive orders and mandates embedded in Obamacare. We only have the “rights” that Big Government gives to us.

Obama’s hatred of Israel is clear to anyone who watches his policies and treatment of Israel’s leadership. So, it is no surprise that the Obama Administration steadfastly refuses to admit that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel. It doesn’t want to alienate its Muslim friends who seek to wipe Israel from the map. After all, Obama is in a partnership with Muslim Brotherhood fanatics to take over the entire Middle East through killing and oppression.

In the 2008 Democrat Platform, it stated that “Jerusalem is and will remain the capital of Israel.” That commitment is no longer in the platform. According to Democratic National Committee spokeswoman Melanie Roussell, the issue of Jerusalem “should be resolved in final status negotiations between the Israelis and the Palestinians…” There is nothing to negotiate. Jerusalem is the capital of Israel. Muslims have no right to it.

While rejecting God and embracing the Islamist agenda against Israel, they’ve also warmly embraced the killing of unborn children as “right” that must be paid for by the American taxpayers. And, they’ve openly embraced homosexual marriages as a “right” that must be guaranteed in every state in the union. The platform opposes “federal and state constitutional amendments and other attempts to deny equal protection under the law” to homosexual couples.

One party embraces Big Government, atheism, Islam, the gay agenda, and the abortion industry; the other embraces the right to life of every human being; free enterprise, small government, the sanctity of biblical marriage; and the God-given rights protected by the U. S. Constitution.

The choice is between black and white not red and blue this political season.

UPDATE: After considerable negative media and the lies of the Democrat convention chairman exposed by the media God and Jeruslaem were added back into the Democrat Party platform. Read more


Tags: , , , , ,

One Comment to “Democrat Platform: God & Jerusalem Out – Abortion & Gay Marriage In”

  1. John says:

    If Israel and Palestine achieved peace, then Palestine could maaintin a 20% minority, as Israel maaintins a 20% minority.The prospective selected borders then would not need to be perfect ethnically, if real and actual equal rights are afforded to minorities in each community.They could even be the 67 borders.The single state is less democratic than a partitioned one if the communities retain any significant national orientation, which looks more than likely at this point.A single state with 51/49 national relationship, would represent the status of 49% feeling other-governed rather than self-governed.The two-state leaves 80% feeling self-governed.The only proviso that I can see is if a non-nationalist party in Israel and in Palestine achieved more than say 30% of each population’s total vote. And, that doesn’t seem likely.It would be more likely if dissent was presented in positive terms, rather than only condemnatory.I wonder about your numbers. Is that migration to the settlements or babies?

Leave a Comment

*